Sunday, July 03, 2016
Repost: History that should not—and will not—disappear: July 4, 1894, illegal overthrow of Hawaii completed
by Larry Geller
![Cannon on the steps of Iolani palace[3]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgGgg-MumJSc2bqYN-REwOwnr3DcpYcM1obKDbIH5hfcAPwMBZaUupHZpOB3QenI0rPV2MeKsw8ZHNfrR6T8qIMNIvWf0O3767RW4JYSUh3oHFi9wclEGdcOzjL0gHnJigYUX-umw/s1600-h/Cannon%252520on%252520the%252520steps%252520of%252520Iolani%252520palace%25255B3%25255D%25255B6%25255D.jpg "Cannon on the steps of Iolani palace[3]")
Cannon on the steps of the occupied Iolani Palace
On July 4, 1894, the Republic of Hawaii was declared, with Sanford B. Dole as president. The illegal overthrow of the independent nation of Hawaii was complete.
Yes, although your daily paper may want you to forget this, it is history that should not be ignored. There’s even a federal law confirming the truth of the history they refuse to print.
From the Apology Resolution, United States Public Law 103-150:
Whereas, in a message to Congress on December 18, 1893, President Grover Cleveland reported fully and accurately on the illegal acts of the conspirators, described such acts as an "act of war, committed with the participation of a diplomatic representative of the United States and without authority of Congress", and acknowledged that by such acts the government of a peaceful and friendly people was overthrown... President Cleveland further concluded that a "substantial wrong has thus been done which a due regard for our national character as well as the rights of the injured people requires we should endeavor to repair" and called for the restoration of the Hawaiian monarchy.
Whereas, the indigenous Hawaiian people never directly relinquished their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people or over their national lands to the United States, either through their monarchy or through a plebiscite or referendum.
A treaty of annexation was never passed by Congress, and President Grover Cleveland withdrew the treaty. Then on this day in history…
On July 4, 1894, the archipelago's new leaders responded to this rebuff by proclaiming a Republic of Hawaii, with Sanford Dole as president. Under its constitution, most legislators would be appointed rather than elected, and only men with savings and property would be eligible for public office. This all but excluded native Hawaiians from the government of their land… [From Overthrow, a book by Stephen Kinzer]
What was the motivation? Need you ask? Why is the US in Iraq?From the Washington Post review of Overthrow:
As Stephen Kinzer tells the story in Overthrow, America's century of regime changing began not in Iraq but Hawaii. Hawaii? Indeed. Kinzer explains that Hawaii's white haole minority -- in cahoots with the U.S. Navy, the White House and Washington's local representative -- conspired to remove Queen Liliuokalani from her throne in 1893 as a step toward annexing the islands. The haole plantation owners believed that by removing the queen (who planned to expand the rights of Hawaii's native majority) and making Hawaii part of the United States, they could get in on a lucrative but protected mainland sugar market. Ever wonder why free trade has such a bad name?
The road leading up to the declaration of the Republic of Hawaii was rocky, and can’t be summed up in a short blog article. Did you know, for example, that a US Senate investigation revealed that a bribe had been offered to Queen Liliuokalani to turn against her people and support the Republic? This snip is from a New York Times article on the Senate investigation, dated 1/29/1894:
![Bribe_thumb3[2]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgmOWJ9A0YFmjAyWV6i5ke5zAdkGdMH5XJ_YLmZMbTngIUxcduWdU3JRkN9VgN5-SQeFP3LjUu33Ybd_5bHmYgoqtdEn-EtIX3XHgFnkS0df57kBRaGEbCHKa-ux-0g83xjGWXvfg/s1600-h/Bribe_thumb3%25255B2%25255D%25255B4%25255D.jpg "Bribe_thumb3[2]")
The declaration of the Republic was not a single, static event. There was considerable debate in Congress on resolutions condemning the overthrow and proposed annexation. For example, this snip from the 1/25/1894 New York Times will give you an idea of the complexity that we lose in simplifying Hawaii’s history:
![Debate_thumb2[2]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhoPt4tZPbrmEhDwCEhey1lHpCYJ97NeUaoZwIXQLQyK8cWHhcojeKxgnoN96wCbSTMYvJkCQdzWtBBCZajA9HMtiRW_Z34A4206MfJBa-qaHVWptTpiKTZNseXB_SDy0w_L7u35Q/s1600-h/Debate_thumb2%25255B2%25255D%25255B8%25255D.jpg "Debate_thumb2[2]")
Each article is much longer than the snips above. It would be worthwhile to skim the New York Times for a complete account of the Congressional debate. No doubt this has already been done. If not, the articles are available on-line for the harvesting..
If you’re not familiar with Hawaiian history, beware of websites that work hard to re-write it. The true picture of the overthrow is not pretty, nor can the acts of the US government be justified or whitewashed. Google cautiously.
Let your children know that there is more to July 4 than barbeques and fireworks. It is a holiday that tears people apart here in Hawaii. See how you can work this history into your celebrations and festivities, so that it will never disappear.
Cleveland was right. The "National Character" was forever stained. The "Unstaining" cannot and will not happen until the wrong has been righted. Larry, this blog, from my perspective, is as good as the best that you have ever written. Given time - I believe that justice and righteousness will eventually prevail - and the illegal occupier will go home with its tail between its legs. The People are starting to speak - and the trend has changed. Even fellow members of the Family of Nations are starting to ask the right questions. But the occupier refuses to give any answers. It has none. It has done us wrong! We know, and the world also knows. Kupa'a!
The courts of the Territory of Hawai‘i derived their authority under the 1900 Act to provide a government for the Territory of Hawaii. The predecessor of the Territory of Hawai‘i was the Republic of Hawai‘i, which the United States Congress in its 1993 Joint Resolution—To acknowledge the 100th anniversary of the January 17, 1893 overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii, and to offer an apology to Native Hawaiians on behalf of the United States for the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii concluded was “self-declared.” The Republic of Hawai‘i’s predecessor was the provisional government, whom President Grover Cleveland reported to the Congress on December 18, 1893, as being “neither de facto nor de jure,” but self-declared as well. Furthermore, Queen Lili‘uokalani, in her June 20, 1894 protest to the United States referred to the provisional government as a “pretended government of the Hawaiian Islands under whatever name,” that enacted and enforced “pretended ‘laws’ subversive of the first principles of free government and utterly at variance with the traditions, history, habits, and wishes of the Hawaiian people.” This is from http://hawaiiankingdom.org/blog/ published June 8, 2006. Self-declared does not mean legal.
<< Home
Post a Comment
Requiring those Captcha codes at least temporarily, in the hopes that it quells the flood of comment spam I've been receiving.