Thursday, November 06, 2014
To understand voting in Hawaii: it wouldn’t hurt if we did better polling…
“
Hawaii, meanwhile, has a long history of terrible polling, perhaps because of the state’s demographic makeup. Between 1998 and 2012, polls of gubernatorial and Senate elections there missed the final margin by an average of almost 12 points, the largest error of any state but Wyoming, according to the FiveThirtyEight database.
”
by Larry Geller
I figured I’d mosey over to fivethirtyeight.com to see how Nate Silver’s predictions worked out, but I soon tripped over a couple of mentions about Hawaii’s lousy polling.
Going back in time, this, from fivethirtyeight:
In 1998, Democrat Ben Cayetano was re-elected as Hawaii’s governor despite trailing Republican Linda Lingle by 11 percentage points in pre-election surveys.
So ok, all those annoying calls you get in the months before each election don’t work very well despite the effort and expense. Why?
The Washington Post tries to explain the difficulty:
Also, as we've written before, polling in Hawaii is difficult for a host of reasons — and in large part because the state's large Asian American population is more difficult to correctly sample and often less willing to answer a pollster's questions.
This is especially a problem given that many of the state's big Democratic primaries pit a white candidate against an Asian American one. Advertiser polling in 2002 and 2010 showed a better picture for the Asian American candidates in those races than was probably the case, while Civil Beat's 2012 poll skewed heavily toward the white candidate, Case.
Ok. Whatever.
Meanwhile, Civil Beat explained their methodology here, if you’re interested in digging deeper.
There is one poll that’s deadly accurate: it was taken on Tuesday, election day. It was a sample of 34.9% of all electoral voters.
Post a Comment
Requiring those Captcha codes at least temporarily, in the hopes that it quells the flood of comment spam I've been receiving.